News

Yellow Sigatoka resistance – Goldfinger mutagenesis trial

Yellow Sigatoka screening - Goldfinger mutagenesis trial

Katie Robertson, Jeff Daniells, David East and Carole Wright, Queensland DAF (Dec 2023)

The screening trial assessing Goldfinger mutant selections’ resistance or susceptibility to the fungal leaf disease, yellow Sigatoka is now complete. Most of the selections had a similar reaction to yellow Sigatoka as the Goldfinger control, however GMS 766 was significantly more resistant, while four others were significantly more susceptible. This latter result demonstrates that mutagenesis can significantly change a plant’s level of yellow Sigatoka resistance.

An estimated $25-30 million per year is spent on controlling yellow Sigatoka leaf spot (Pseudocercospora musae) Identifying varieties with better resistance to the disease, provided they were otherwise commercially viable, would be of great benefit to the industry by reducing input costs and reliance on fungicides. 

Over the 2023 wet season, a yellow Sigatoka screening trial was conducted at the South Johnstone Research Facility on the top-twenty Goldfinger selections which had been developed through DAF’s mutagenesis project.

The block had been nurse suckered to standardise plant development stage. Leaf disease control ceased a few months prior to nurse suckering to build up inoculum levels and ensure adequate disease pressure. Plants were assessed for severity of leaf spot disease on 3 occasions, at monthly intervals leading up to bunching. The assessment consisted of determining the Youngest Leaf Spotted (10 or more mature necrotic lesions (YLS), and the Youngest Leaf with greater than 33% of the leaf lamina destroyed by disease (YL33). The Total number of Functional Leaves (TFL) was recorded if the disease was not present or had not progressed to the >33% necrosis severity level. For the purposes of this article, only the YLS and TFL data will be discussed.

While Goldfinger has resistance to black Sigatoka, this is not the case for yellow Sigatoka, to which it is better described as having an intermediate reaction.  Of particular interest was how the new selections compared to Goldfinger and the possible effect mutagenesis may have had on the plants ’ reaction to this disease.  Figure 1 below shows the average YLS of Goldfinger was 6.4, which was similar   to fifteen of the twenty mutant selections. ‘GMS 766’ was the only selection that demonstrated better resistance to leaf spot than Goldfinger, having an average YLS of 7.9.  

On the other end of the spectrum, ‘GMS 602’, ‘GMS 211’, ‘GMS 145’, and ‘GMS 255’ had average YLS values of between 5.4 and 4.4, demonstrating  they were significantly more susceptible to the disease. Although not the original objective of the project, these results demonstrate mutagenesis can significantly change a plant’s level of yellow Sigatoka resistance. The dwarf Lady Finger selection ‘Dwarf Rossi’ was planted as a single guard plant at the beginning of each row of Goldfinger. 

The level of disease was comparable to the ‘Dwarf Rossi’ plants in the variety evaluation, allowing comparisons to be made between the two trials. It was not significantly different to Goldfinger in its reaction to yellow Sigatoka. 

Figure 1: Youngest leaf with 10 or more necrotic lesions (YLS) for the 20 Goldfinger Mutant Selections, standard Goldfinger, and the Lady Finger variety ‘Dwarf Rossi’ (average of 3 rating occasions; error bars represent +/-1 standard error ). The different coloured bars indicate varieties that were statistically similar (yellow) or significantly different (red/green) to Goldfinger (patterned fill).
This research has been funded as part of the project Improved Plant Protection for the Banana Industry (BA16001), which is funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana research and development levy, co-investment from the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. 
Hort innovation logo

Yellow Sigatoka resistance – agronomic evaluation trial (October 2020)

Yellow Sigatoka screening - agronomic evaluation trial (October 2020)

Katie Robertson, Jeff Daniells, David East, and Carole Wright, Queensland DAF (Dec 2023)

The screening trial assessing new varieties’ resistance or susceptibility to the fungal leaf disease, yellow Sigatoka is now complete. Varying degrees of leaf spot resistance were observed among the Cavendish (highly susceptible), Lady Finger (intermediate resistance) and CIRAD hybrids (resistant).

An estimated $25-30 million per year is spent on controlling yellow Sigatoka leaf spot (Pseudocercospora musae) in Australian banana plantations. Identifying varieties with better resistance to the disease, provided they were otherwise commercially viable, would be of great benefit to the industry, by reducing input costs and reliance on fungicides.

Over the 2023 wet season, a yellow Sigatoka screening trial was conducted at the South Johnstone Research Facility. This was after the agronomic assessments on 15 varieties had been completed in the 2020 Variety Evaluation and the block was nurse-suckered. 

Leaf disease control ceased a few months prior to nurse suckering to build up inoculum levels and ensure adequate disease pressure. Plants were assessed for severity of leaf spot disease on 3 occasions, at monthly intervals leading up to bunching. 

The assessment consisted of determining the Youngest Leaf Spotted (10 or more mature necrotic lesions) (YLS), and the Youngest Leaf with greater than 33% of the leaf lamina destroyed by disease (YL33). 

The Total number of Functional Leaves (TFL) was recorded if the disease was not present or had not progressed to the >33% necrosis severity level. For the purposes of this article, only the YLS and TFL data will be discussed.

Figure 1 shows four of the varieties had comparable disease severity to the very susceptible reference variety, ‘Williams’, which had an average YLS of 4.5. These included the TR4 resistant Cavendish ‘Asia Pacific #1’, along with the two tetraploid ‘High Noon’ selections (one with a ‘clean’ rachis [HNC] and one with a ‘dirty’ rachis [HND]) , and the Pendulous Lady Finger selection. 

The other four Lady Finger varieties demonstrated slightly better resistance and were statistically similar to ‘Pacific Plantain’ (YLS = 6.2), which has a documented intermediate level of resistance to leaf spot. Overseas, the hybrid ‘CIRAD 925’ has demonstrated both yellow and black Sigatoka (Pseudocercospora fijiensis) resistance (Risède et al. 2019). 

It was anticipated that the other three CIRAD hybrids may also possess this characteristic, which proved to be the case. Although no leaf spot was present, ‘CIRAD 925’ and ‘CIRAD 918’ only maintained around seven functional leaves throughout the assessments, with older leaves snapping due to petiole weakness, while ‘CIRAD L9’ and ‘CIRAD X17’ sustained over 10 functional leaves. 

The common leaf fungi, Cordana leaf spot (Neocordana musae) and banana leaf speckle (Mycosphaerella musae), were likely present on all varieties, but more obvious along the leaf margins of the CIRAD hybrids due to the absence of yellow Sigatoka. ‘Dwarf Ducasse’ was included as the resistant reference variety and supported an average of 13 functional leaves with no yellow Sigatoka present.

While the CRIAD hybrids remained unaffected by yellow Sigatoka (CIRAD X17 pitcured here), there were other common pathogenic fungi, primarily Cordana and banana leaf speckle present on some older leaves.
The TR4 resistant Cavendish 'Asia Paific #1', was as susceptible as Williams to yellow Sigatoka.
Figure 1 Youngest leaf with 10 or more necrotic lesions (YLS) for 15 varieties at South Johnstone (average of 3 rating occasions; error bars represent +/-1 standard error). If the YLS stage was not reached for a variety (i.e. the CIRAD hybrids and Dwarf Ducasse) the leaf number represents the total number of functional leaves present. Williams (very susceptible), Pacific Plantain (intermediate), and Dwarf Ducasse (highly resistant) were used as references to assess the disease reaction of the new varieties. The different coloured bars illustrate varieties that were statisically similar to the reference varieties (patterned fill).
References
Risède, J.-M., Achard, R., Brat, P., Chabrier, C., Damour, G., Guillermet, C., de Lapeyre., Lœillet, D., Lakhia, S., Meynard, P., Tixier, P., Tran Quoc, H., Salmon, F., Côte, F.-X. and Dorel, M. (2019). The agroecological transition of Cavendish banana cropping systems in the French West Indies. In The agroecological transition of agricultural systems in the Global South. Côte, F.-X., Poirier-Magona, E, Perret, S., Roudier, P., Rapidel, B., Thirion, M.-C, eds. (Agricultures et défis du monde collection, AFD, CIRAD, Éditions Quæ, Versailles). Pp. 107 – 126. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/592993/1/ID592993.pdf 

More information

This research has been funded as part of the project Improved Plant Protection for the Banana Industry (BA16001), which is funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana research and development levy, co-investment from the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture.
Hort innovation logo

Sharan Muthukumar

Sharan Muthukumar

The potential of banana diversity is what fascinates Sharan

Sharan is a Technical Officer working at the Department of Primary Industries (DPI), South Johnstone. Born in a town called Mettupalayam in southern India, Sharan moved to Australia to pursue his Master’s in Agricultural Science (Horticulture) at UQ Gatton campus. He has been working with DPI since September last year (2023). His primary research areas include the agronomic evaluation of new TR4 resistant Cavendish varieties and Race 1 resistant Lady Finger-like varieties. He’s also responsible for the maintenance of the Australian field collection of banana varieties at South Johnstone, which is a significant undertaking to ensure that the collection remains available for future research.

Sharan is passionate about working with different banana varieties and learning how to identify them. He finds the diversity of bananas fascinating and believes that exploring their genetic intricacies could reveal potential solutions to emerging challenges. One of the most exciting aspects of Sharan’s work is taste-testing different varieties, which allows him to experience firsthand the diverse flavours and textures they offer. In his free time, Sharan enjoys listening to music and going bushwalking. He’s excited to be a part of DPI and being able to make a positive contribution to the Australian Banana Industry.

Sharan meet a researcher
Sharan Muthukumar
Technical Officer
Department of Primary Industries
Centre for Wet Tropics Agriculture, South Johnstone, Qld

First ratoon observations and results (2020 agronomic trial)

First ratoon results - agronomic evaluation trial (October 2020)

By Katie Robertson & Jeff Daniells, Queensland Department of Primary Industries

Trends observed in the plant crop (see here) continued in the first ratoon. Williams outproduced the TR4 resistant Cavendish varieties. All the Lady Finger selections performed well compared to the standard Lady Finger, with either improved plant or bunch characteristics and no yield reduction.

Productivity declined in the short statured TR4 resistant Cavendish Asia Pacific #1, while GCTCV 106 continued to perform comparably to Williams.

The yield reduction measured in the plant crop of the TR4 resistant Cavendish variety Asia Pacific #1 (AP#1) was further amplified by the end of the first ratoon. AP#1 yielded 33% less than Williams over the 2 crops (29.3 versus 44.1 kg/year). This was due to their longer cycle time and a lower average bunch weight (26.7 versus 37.9 kg). AP#1 pseudostem height only increased by 8% between the plant crop and first ratoon (2.2 to 2.4 m), remaining significantly shorter than the other Cavendish varieties. Most other TR4 resistant Cavendish selections from Taiwan are taller than Williams. Finger length also remained shorter, with only 17% of AP#1 fruit falling into the premium size grade (22 – 26cm), compared to 56% for Williams. The GCTCV 106 selection – which originated from a vigorous plant identified in the previous 2018 South Johnstone variety evaluation (BA16001) – again performed comparably to Williams with regards to cycle time and yield (see table). Unfortunately, this variety has not demonstrated TR4 resistance in the Coastal Plains (Northern Territory) screening trials (see here for more).

The TR4 resistant Cavendish selection, Asia Pacific #1, remained shorter than Williams with reduced bunch weights, a longer crop cycle and shorter fruit lengths.

There were no yield differences among the six Lady Finger varieties, with some selections displaying reduced pseudostem heights and better bunch conformation.

All Lady Finger selections, except Pendulous Lady Finger (PLF), remained significantly shorter in stature than standard Lady Finger in the first ratoon (11 – 30% shorter). In the plant crop, PLF had yielded 19% more than Lady Finger per 12-months, but by the end of the first ratoon the yields compared over the 2 crops was not different. The standard Lady Finger experienced a 33% increase in bunch weight between the plant crop and first ratoon, going from 12.2 to 18.5 kg, while PLF only had 15% heavier bunches in the first ratoon (17.7 to 20.9 kg). The fruit in PLF bunches took longer to fill (22.3 weeks) than standard Lady Finger (17.1 weeks), and had issues with premature ripening, likely influenced by the timing of bunch emergence and the environmental conditions during fruit filling. Nonetheless, the PLF plants lived up to their name and continued to produce bunches with a more desirable conformation. The four other Lady Finger varieties did not yield significantly differently to the industry standard.

The yield of 'Dwarf Lady Finger' was comparable to standard Lady Finger but was 30% (or 1.4 m) shorter in stature.

The novel hybrids from CIRAD continued to perform poorly in the first ratoon, in terms of bunch size and pseudostem height.

In the plant crop, 40% of the CIRAD hybrid 918 plants had snapped before harvest despite being similar height to Williams. The incidence of pseudostem snapping in this variety rose to 87% in the first ratoon, meaning there were not enough data plants to include in the analysis. The remaining three CIRAD hybrids had bunch weights 25 – 64% lower than Williams per 12-months for the 2 crops, and CIRAD 925 and X17 were taller by 10 and 17%, respectively. X17 has demonstrated a high level of resistance to TR4 in the NT (see here for more).

Where to next?

The trial block was nurse suckered at the beginning of the year to manage the cropping cycle, and the varieties were rated for yellow Sigatoka over the wet season. These results will be reported on later in the year.  

The TR4 resistant CIRAD hybrid X17 yielded 34% less than Williams per 12-months over the two crop cycles.

More information

This research has been funded as part of a project funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana research and development levy, co-investment from the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture.

 

Insect sanctuaries for beneficial predators and parasites

Insect sanctuaries for beneficial predators and parasites in bananas

By Daniel Farrell

Beneficial insects are species that provide a positive effect or interaction in an ecosystem, such as pollinators, predators, or decomposers. Predators and parasites, known collectively as natural enemies, play a critical role as beneficial insects by suppressing and controlling pest insects in ecosystems.

Beneficial predators and parasites: hover fly, green lacewing, and orange caterpillar parasite (left to right)

In most agricultural ecosystems, including bananas, beneficial insects aren’t considered in management programs. Farming practices, for instance, pesticide usage, monocropping, tillage, and weed control along with the lack of suitable habitat can cause these ecosystems to be unhabitable for beneficial insects to remain, thrive and continue to provide biological control.

Insect sanctuaries are areas of non-harvested companion plants grown free from disturbances of farming practices and grown to encourage and attract beneficial insects to establish and remain in the ecosystem.  Insect sanctuaries may consist of flowering or herbaceous plants, native shrubs or trees, or areas of specific weeds and grasses.

Insect sanctuaries are important for creating an agricultural ecosystem that is sustainable and suitable for beneficial insects by providing them with alternative food sources including important proteins and carbohydrates. In addition, sanctuaries provide harbourage and shelter increasing insect longevity and reproduction. An ecosystem with high biodiversity is generally more resilient to changes and less likely to experience pest outbreaks as natural enemies are available.

Insect sanctuaries can be planted externally or internally in existing production systems, as interrow or guard row (strips), or as a border or hedgerow (see below). Multiple small insect sanctuaries are just as significant to beneficial insects as large-planted areas, as they provide greater cross-over throughout the crop to optimize pest control and safe areas.

Designs of how insect sanctuaries can be incorporated into a cropping system

This DAF innovation-funded project aimed to use a Conservation IPDM approach to alter the banana ecosystem to provide more favourable conditions to enhance the population of beneficial insects. Seven flowering plants were evaluated including dill, fennel, Salvia, lemon balm, Thai chilli, garlic chives, and Impatiens (pictured).

These treatments were compared to a bare-ground control to determine if the composition of the insect community could be altered by incorporating additional plant biodiversity. The abundance (how many individuals) and diversity (how many different species) of insects attracted to each treatment were monitored in March – September 2022 using sticky traps, pitfall traps, and physical observations at the South Johnstone research facility. Collected insects were identified to the species level and then sorted into groups based on their role in the system as beneficial (predators, parasites, decomposers, etc) or pest (sap-feeders, herbivores, omnivores, etc) insects.

In general, the results found that insect diversity and abundance significantly increased over the trial duration. This could be due to either a combined treatment effect where the addition of all insect sanctuaries increased diversity and abundance to the trial site, or a general increase in abundance and diversity over time (i.e. warmer weather). From data models, we were able to devise some general relationships between treatments and the attraction or suppression effect they had on the insect groups (see below). 

Suppression or attraction effect of each flowering insect sanctuary treatment for specific groups

From these trial findings, Salvia and Impatiens would likely be suitable plants for insect sanctuaries in bananas, due to their high attraction for natural enemies and suppression of some pests.  Dill would also seem suitable due to its good attraction to predators and suppression effect on pests; however, noting it was not a preferred host by parasites. Interestingly, Salvia, Thai chili, and Garlic chives were all suppressive to Thysanoptera (Thrips), further research could be useful to provide an alternative suppression option for banana rust thrips and banana flower thrips.

Finding the high attraction of beneficial insects to Salvia and Impatiens suggests that further studies in this area would be useful. Ideally, larger plantings with assessments for bunch pests on fruit should be conducted to explore pest-controlling relationships. Ultimately, a list of suitable plants for incorporation into insect sanctuaries associated with banana plantations considering seasonality and soil types could provide growers with options for dedicating an area on their farm for beneficial insect conservation.  

For more information contact:

The Better Bananas team
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
South Johnstone
13 25 23 or email betterbananas@daf.qld.gov.au 

This project was funded by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries through an Agri-Science Queensland innovation grant.

A growers’ guide to ant related problem and their management

A growers' guide to ant related problems and their management

By Daniel Farrell, Richard Piper, David East and Kathy Grice

Ants are commonly found in commercial and backyard plantings of bananas across Australia. Ants find suitable sites to nest including in the ground, behind old leaf sheaths, inside decaying pseudostems or on weeds and leaf trash surrounding the plants. Depending on the species, ants play a different role on the farm and have a different effect on production.

Ants – Good and bad

Different species of ants can co-exist in bananas, however, depending on management practices and the surrounding environment, only one or two species typically dominate at any given time. Ants can be broadly split into two groups, based on their food preferences, either sugar feeders or protein feeders.

Protein feeders including green tree ants, Argentine ants, and coastal brown ants can be useful biological control agents as they prey on pest insects including banana scab moth, cluster caterpillar, banana weevil borer and thrips.

Sugar feeders on the other hand, can be detrimental as they aid the build-up of sap sucking insects such as aphids, scale insects and mealybugs, which they protect (‘farm’) in return for their sugary secretions. Many species are involved, and they are commonly referred to as sugar or tramp ants.

Invasive ant species (Electric ants, fire ants and yellow crazy ants) are also be present in Queensland. Contact Biosecurity Queensland on 13 25 23 if you suspect you have exotic ants on your farm.

Ant problems

Ants generally aren’t considered a major pest for bananas, however, damage to fruit associated with abdominal spray secretions, secondary infections and pests, or nest construction in the bunch can be an issue.

Several species of ants spray formic acid from their abdomens when disturbed, which can damage the fruit. This damage appears as dark brown to black sunken trails or marks on the fruit skin.

Formic acid spray damage by ants on fruit.
Sooty mould growth on fruit associated with honeydew from sap sucking insects ‘farmed' by ants.

Ants protecting sap sucking insects in the bunches can lead to black fungal growth known as sooty mould developing on the fruit. Sooty mould is caused by a fungus growing on the honey dew produced by sap sucking insects, for example scale insects, mealybugs and aphids. This mould is superficial, but difficult to remove from fruit. If banana aphids are present, they may also transmit the virus that causes bunchy top disease.

 

During wet weather ants can build nests by carrying soil and debris up into the bunch. This contamination can result in marking of the fruit when it is harvested and transported to the shed.

Ants also pose an occupational health and safety hazard to workers, with risks of biting, stinging or injury from formic acid sprays. Ants can also cause indirect problems such as damaging and blocking irrigation lines.  

Ant management

Ants can be difficult to manage, however, they are generally suppressed with insecticide treatments used against other pests. Ground spray applications for banana weevil borer or banana rust thrips control will reduce populations and bunch protection applications will protect the fruit.

For more information contact:

The Better Bananas team
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
South Johnstone
13 25 23 or email betterbananas@daf.qld.gov.au 

This information has been updated as part of the Banana Integrated Pest and Disease Management Program (BA21004) which is funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana industry research and development levies and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. The Queensland Government has also co-funded the project through the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries.

Daniel Farrell

Daniel Farrell

Harnessing nature’s defenders: the work of an upcoming banana entomologist

Daniel has worked as a technical officer since mid-2019, working with Plant pathologist, David East and Entomologist, Richard Piper. Before that, he gained his introduction to bananas working as a field officer with the Banana Extension team.

‘Working under the plant pathologist and entomologist really gives me the best of both the banana pest and disease worlds,’ Daniel said. ‘I love drawing connections between the two and developing my skills in integrated pest and disease management.  Every day there is always something new to learn from my mentors and that’s always exciting to me.  I’m also extremely looking forward to conducting more project work with beneficial insects (predators and parasites) in banana production systems’.

Daniel Farrell Researcher profile

Daniel Farrell
Technical officer
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
Centre for Wet Tropics Agriculture
South Johnstone

Daniel was born and raised just northwest of Hobart, Tasmania, in the mountains of Collinsvale. He grew up helping in his parents’ vineyard and mostly looking after sheep and horses. His family spent a few transition years on the Gold Coast at Mt Tamborine, looking after a macadamia farm, before moving further north to Cairns in 2015.  

Daniel studied a Bachelor of Science majoring in Zoology and Ecology at James Cook University, at the Cairns campus. He started his Masters of Philosophy with James Cook University (JCU, Cairns Campus) in May of 2023. His thesis focuses on the mite predator ladybird, Stethorus fenestralis, looking to develop a methodology to mass-produce ladybirds for biological control and to explore the influences of pesticides on Stethorus populations.

On the weekend, you can normally find Daniel playing tabletop games with his friends or hunting down a new house plant and treats at the markets.

‘I’m also have a strong passion for my visual arts projects and like using my spare time as a creative outlet,’ Daniel said.

Daniel loves some banana bread fresh out of the oven with vanilla ice-cream topped with honey! But they are also a great snack on their own.

Banana Roadshows 2024

Recent Banana Roadshows apeel to participants!

The recent banana roadshows were well attended by over 120 growers, agronomists, ag resellers and industry stakeholders. The four roadshow events were held during August and September in Carnarvon, Western Australia, along with Tully, Innisfail, and Mareeba in FNQ. This year marks 10 years since the first banana roadshow events commenced!

The events were delivered as part of the National Banana Development and Extension Program and provided the opportunity for attendees to hear updates on an array of different research and development topics. The series highlighted recent findings on research including biological bunch pest control, yellow Sigatoka, Sooty blotch, nematodes, soil health, nitrogen rate trials, and an update on variety development. Also included was an update on the Australian banana marketing program and benchmarking.

This year also featured a “walk and talk” session, which included interactive displays to spark further conversation between researchers and participants.

The roadshows were well received with 92% of FNQ participants who provided feedback saying that they learnt something new that would assist their business as a result of attending. Participants had positive feedback on the half-day events.        

One participant said ‘The short direct presentations worked well and conveyed a good amount of info.’

Another participant said ‘Loved the quick & sharp presentations. The layout was great, especially being time poor with the option to stay back to chat… Great researchers and crew.’  

The extension team would like to thank all growers and industry stakeholders who attended, as well as banana researchers Jeff Daniells, Daniel Farrell, Richard Piper, Kathy Grice, David East, Alex Lindsay, Andrés Morera, Tony Pattison (DAF) for their contribution along with Belinda Van Schaik (Hort Innovation), Andrew Burns (ABGC), Geoff Wilson (ABGC) and Eric Schluter (Aglytica). The team would also like to thank ABGC’s communication team and Valerie Shrubb and Mel Ford (WA DPIRD) for their support.

Keep an eye out in industry communications for info about NSW Roadshow activities later in the year.

Extension events are funded as part of the National Banana Development and Extension Program (BA19004). This project is funded by Hort Innovation, using the Hort Innovation banana research and development levy, co-investment from the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture.

Nectaries

Unravelling the mystery of banana tips

What is the black spot at the tip of my bananas? This was a question recently asked by a grower. The DAF extension team set out to investigate the issue and find out the cause.

It was suggested that the discoloration could be Mokillo disease, a bacterial infection that causes dry rot at the end of the finger, starting in the same area on the fruit that the grower was questioning. Mokillo typically only affects a few fingers in a hand, these fingers are often smaller and narrower or pinched at the tip. Mokillo infection will continue to move through the fruit over time and have a rusty red gummy appearance (internally). It was evident that the issue in question was not Mokillo given that the blackened areas were present in all examined fruit, and the symptoms did not match.

From a market perspective, the team firstly wanted to demonstrate that these black areas did not progress into the fruit pulp nor display Mokillo-like symptoms as it ripened.  The extension team took a sample of mature fruit and cross sectioned them at the different ripening stages. The black tips were present in ALL of the fruit and there was no progression into the fruit throughout the ripening process. Consequently, the DAF extension team was confident that this wasn’t Mokillo.

After this initial investigation, the query persisted as to the nature of this blackened internal tip. With a theory that the blackening was associated with the physical make-up of the fruit, a review of banana literature, including the basics of banana ‘anatomy’, found that this blackened area is called a nectary (Septal nectary). Nectaries are structures in plants, often found at the base of stamens (male flower parts) that provide food rewards for insect or bird pollinators and therefore play a role in the fertility of plants. Studies found that the nectary cells disintegrate/oxidise in Grand Naine when the flower ends are ‘unfurling’ allowing the reproductive structures (style and stamens) to be accessed by insects to pollinate. An interesting fact, is that this disintegrating/oxidising of the nectary acts as a ‘roadblock’ for the growth of the pollen tube towards the ovary. It has been suggested that this may be a contributing factor in why Cavendish is sterile and doesn’t produce seeds.

Nectaries female parts of banana flower
Floral structures of a banana finger showing oxidised/disintegrated nectary.
The project team cross sectioned fruit at different floral developmental stages and confirmed what previous research found, in that the blackening of the nectary in Williams Cavendish occurs when the flower end reproductive structures are exposed to pollinating insects.

Overall, these nectaries which have disintegrated/oxidised don’t appear to impact fruit quality. It is possible that these areas allow for secondary infections, like Mokillo, which explains some of the similar symptoms. However, further investigations would be needed to better understand the risks and conditions which may favour these infections. The DAF extension team will continue to keep tabs on the blackening of nectaries at ad hoc times throughout the year in the course of their work and make observations in other varieties.

References

  • Soares, T.L.; Souza, E.H.; Costa, M.A.P.C.; Silva, S.O.; Santos-Serejo, J.A. In vivo fertilization of banana. Ciênc. Rural 2014, 44, 37–42.
  •  dos Santos Silva, M.; Santana, A.N.; dos Santos-Serejo, J.A.; Ferreira, C.F.; Amorim, E.P. Morphoanatomy and Histochemistry of Septal Nectaries Related to Female Fertility in Banana Plants of the ‘Cavendish’ Subgroup. Plants 2022, 11, 1177.
This article has been compiled as part of the National Banana Development and Extension Program (BA19004) which is funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana research and development levy, co-investment from the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture.
Hort innovation logo

Agronomic evaluation of Lady Finger-like varieties – plant crop results

Plant crop results - agronomic evaluation of Lady Finger-like varieties

(Trial establised December 2022)

Lady Finger-like varieties from Brazil under trial at South Johnstone

By Jeff Daniells, Katie Robertson, Sharan Muthukumar and Carole Wright (August 2024)

Latest update...

Several Fusarium wilt Race 1 resistant Lady Finger-like varieties are being assessed for agronomic performance at the South Johnstone Research Facility. The plant crop data and a summary of the results is available below.

The first ratoon harvest is already underway with harvest commencing in May 2024. The trial will be completed after the first ratoon harvest. Local taste panel results for varieties will be available then. Results from Panama disease Race 1 screening available next year will help guide any future on-farm studies. 

Those who attended the September 2023 field walk had an opportunity to see plant crop bunches of these Lady Finger-like varieties. A video field walk through the block, prepared the 2023 Industry Roadshows in NSW at about that time, is available.

Background

According to the ‘Australian Horticulture Statistics Handbook 2022/23’ the annual production of Lady Finger banana in that year was 11,228 t compared to 363,023 t of Cavendish, so Lady Fingers represent only about 3% of overall banana production. However, the farmgate value of Lady Finger production can be estimated as worth about $30 million, which because of the higher price paid for Lady Finger per kg of fruit, represents about 5% of the overall banana industry. But whatever way you want to look at it, the Lady Finger industry is an important industry in its own right.  In New South Wales the Lady Finger industry is proportionally much more important than it is overall for Australia.

In the April 2024 edition of Australian Bananas (see here pp 26-27) we drew attention to the constraint that Fusarium wilt Race 1 has placed on Lady Finger production in Australia. Varieties with resistance have been sought and evaluated over time, but while many have been identified with resistance, none have so far measured up as replacements for the Race 1 susceptible Lady Finger in the marketplace. So where possible, affected growers have sought new ground not infested with the pathogen.

In 2019/20 some new Lady Finger selections, Lady Finger hybrids and Sugar hybrids were imported from banana breeding programs in Brazil to evaluate in Australia. As described in the April article in Australian Bananas, some of these are being screened against Race 1 on the Atherton Tablelands. Here in this article, we present results from the plant crop of their agronomic evaluation at South Johnstone. This evaluation is part of the project BA21002 – ‘New varieties for Australian banana growers’.

Trial results in plant crop

Tissue cultured plants of 3 Lady Finger selections, 4 Lady Finger hybrids and 2 Sugar (Silk) hybrids were field planted in December 2022 at South Johnstone DAF. Pacovan, SCS451 and the hybrids all came from Brazil. The 6 hybrids from the program of EMBRAPA are all reported to be resistant to both Panama disease Race 1 and yellow Sigatoka. Japira and Pacoua are also reported to be resistant to black Sigatoka. SCS451 is from the program of EPAGRI and was purported to have tolerance to Panama disease Race 1. Bunch emergence commenced in May 2023, and harvest was completed in December 2023.

Pacovan Ken
Pacovan Ken were more pendulous than Lady Finger
Plantina lady finger hyrbid
Platina is shorter in stature than the other Lady Finger hybrids
Pacovan
Bunches of Pacovan were more pendulous than Lady Finger

Unfortunately, all except one of the Lady Finger (Improved) control plants were tissue culture offtypes. Thus, there are serious limitations when wishing to compare the new selections with the industry standard, Lady Finger. Nevertheless, reliable comparisons can be made amongst the new varieties. The agronomic and yield results from the plant crop are presented in the table below. Relative comparisons from previous studies suggest that for the Lady Finger data included in the table, the pseudostem height is indicative, but the duration from planting to harvest would usually be a little slower resulting in bunch weight/12 months being more in line with that obtained for SCS451.

Table: Selected yield and plant characteristics of varieties in the plant crop

Summary of results

A summary of the results and observations made are as follows:

  • The highest yielding varieties (per unit of time) were Pacovan, Pacovan Ken and SCS451, which were all significantly higher yielding than Tropical, Princesa and Japira. 

  • The tallest variety was Japira and the shortest in stature was SCS451. Several aspects of crop management are more difficult with the taller varieties.

  •  Japira, Pacovan Ken and Pacovan had significantly longer fruit on the 3rd hand, while fruit of Tropical and Princesa was significantly shorter.

More information...

This research has been funded as part of the project New varieties for Australian banana growers (BA21002), which is funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana industry research and development levies and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. The Queensland Government has also co-funded the project through the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries.